Palestine 36 Is the Anti-Colonialist Action Epic Hollywood Never Made

A film titled Palestine 36 is generating significant attention ahead of its release, with early reviews describing it as a sweeping, anti-colonialist epic that carries…

Palestine 36 Is the Anti-Colonialist Action Epic Hollywood Never Made
Palestine 36 Is the Anti-Colonialist Action Epic Hollywood Never Made

A film titled Palestine 36 is generating significant attention ahead of its release, with early reviews describing it as a sweeping, anti-colonialist epic that carries the scale and ambition of a Hollywood blockbuster. The review published by Screen Rant, written by lead film critic Gregory Nussen, positions the film as a rare kind of political cinema — one that doesn’t sacrifice spectacle for ideology, or ideology for entertainment.

What is confirmed: the film is titled Palestine 36, it has been reviewed by Gregory Nussen for Screen Rant, and it has been described in headline terms as an anti-colonialist thriller of Hollywood blockbuster proportions. The following article is written using those confirmed facts alongside verifiable general context about the film’s subject matter and the current landscape of political cinema.

What We Know About Palestine 36

The title alone signals the film’s historical grounding. 1936 was a pivotal year in the history of Mandatory Palestine — the period when the Arab Revolt began, a major Palestinian uprising against British colonial rule and Jewish immigration that would shape the region’s trajectory for decades. A film set in or around that era carries enormous political and historical weight, particularly given the ongoing conflict in Gaza and the broader global conversation about Palestinian identity and self-determination.

Screen Rant’s review, written by Gregory Nussen — the outlet’s lead film critic and a recipient of the 2022 New York Film Critics Circle Graduate Prize in Criticism — frames the film as an “anti-colonialist thrilling epic.” That combination of words is deliberate and telling. Anti-colonialist cinema has a long tradition, but it rarely gets described alongside the language of blockbuster filmmaking. The suggestion here is that Palestine 36 manages both: political conviction delivered through the grammar of mainstream, high-energy cinema.

Nussen, who has written for Deadline Hollywood, Slant Magazine, Backstage, and Salon, among others, is a credentialed voice in film criticism. Their framing of the film as a “Hollywood Blockbuster Proportions” production suggests the movie is not a low-budget art house exercise but something with genuine cinematic ambition.

Why This Film Arrives at a Charged Moment

Few topics in contemporary global politics carry more emotional intensity than Palestine. A film rooted in the history of 1936 — a year that predates the founding of the state of Israel and sits squarely within the British colonial period — enters a discourse that is already at boiling point.

Political films set in historical periods often serve as mirrors for the present. By revisiting 1936, Palestine 36 appears to be making an argument about the roots of the current conflict — tracing the lines of displacement, resistance, and colonial power back to their origins. That’s a bold creative and political choice, and one that reviewers and audiences are clearly paying attention to.

The description of the film as a “thriller” adds another dimension. Thrillers are built on tension, urgency, and stakes. Applying that genre framework to anti-colonialist history suggests the filmmakers are not interested in dry historical drama — they want audiences gripped, emotionally invested, and ideologically engaged all at once.

The Landscape of Anti-Colonialist Cinema Right Now

Films that center colonized peoples as protagonists — rather than as background figures in the stories of their colonizers — have gained increasing visibility in recent years. From Lagaan to RRR to The Battle of Algiers, some of the most enduring and powerful films in world cinema have been built around resistance to occupation and empire.

What makes Palestine 36 potentially significant is the specificity of its subject and the moment it arrives in. Palestinian stories have historically been underrepresented in mainstream cinema, and a film that engages with that history at blockbuster scale — rather than as niche political documentary — represents a notable shift in what kinds of stories are being told and how.

Detail Confirmed Information
Film Title Palestine 36
Reviewer Gregory Nussen, Lead Film Critic, Screen Rant
Review Published March 18, 2026
Review Outlet Screen Rant
Described As Anti-colonialist thrilling epic of Hollywood blockbuster proportions
Critic’s Credential 2022 New York Film Critics Circle Graduate Prize in Criticism

What the Review’s Framing Tells Us

Gregory Nussen is not a critic who uses language carelessly. Their background spans serious outlets — Slant Magazine is known for rigorous, often contrarian criticism; Deadline Hollywood covers the industry from the inside. When a critic with that range describes a film as operating at “Hollywood blockbuster proportions,” it’s a meaningful signal about production value, pacing, and emotional scale.

The word “epic” is equally loaded. Epics are films that demand something from the audience — time, attention, emotional investment. They tend to cover large historical canvases and ask viewers to reckon with forces bigger than any individual character. Framing Palestine 36 as an epic suggests the film is not interested in small, contained storytelling. It wants to say something large about history, power, and people.

Whether the film delivers on that ambition fully is something the full review addresses — though access to the complete text was not available for this report. What is clear from the headline framing alone is that Screen Rant’s lead critic found it worthy of serious, enthusiastic engagement.

What to Watch for When the Film Releases Widely

Films like this tend to generate debate well beyond standard film criticism circles. Expect Palestine 36 to be discussed in political media, academic spaces, and on social platforms as much as in entertainment press. The combination of historical subject matter, thriller genre mechanics, and the current global context almost guarantees a reception that extends far beyond box office numbers.

For audiences interested in political cinema, historical drama, or simply films that take their subject matter seriously, Palestine 36 appears to be a title worth tracking closely as more reviews and wider release information become available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Palestine 36 about?
Based on its title and review framing, the film appears to be set in or around 1936 Mandatory Palestine, a period marked by the Arab Revolt against British colonial rule. The full plot details were not available in the confirmed source material.

Who reviewed Palestine 36 for Screen Rant?
Gregory Nussen, Screen Rant’s Lead Film Critic and recipient of the 2022 New York Film Critics Circle Graduate Prize in Criticism, wrote the review published on March 18, 2026.

How was the film described in the review?
The review described Palestine 36 as an “anti-colonialist thrilling epic of Hollywood blockbuster proportions,” suggesting both political ambition and mainstream cinematic scale.

Is Palestine 36 a documentary or a narrative film?
Based on the review’s language — including words like “thriller” and “epic” — it appears to be a narrative feature film rather than a documentary, though this has not been explicitly confirmed in the available source material.

When was the review published?
The Screen Rant review was published on March 18, 2026.

Where can I read the full review?
The full review by Gregory Nussen is published on Screen Rant’s website at screenrant.com, though some content may require a signed-in account to access in full.

3007 articles

Editorial Team

The Editorial Team is the named, credentialed group responsible for every article on this site. Each piece is researched by a section editor, reviewed by a credentialed practitioner where the topic warrants it, and signed off by the Editor in Chief before publication. The corrections process is public; named editors are accountable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *